ghostkid:

jumblejo:

mikedurstewitzsodmg:

jumblejo:

THANK YOU.
hate this book and everything it promotes about entitlement complexes and codependent relationships and abusive egotistical assholes and ugh.

It’s a children’s book

Which makes it even worse.
This book encourages selfish, entitled behavior where this boy continues to ask for and take everything from the tree for his own use/gain until nothing but a stump remains.  How is this a message we want to send to children?
Where is the positive concept?
Is it in the boy’s behavior?  He continually shows up and asks for the tree to give to him.  No basis or reasons why, he just asks for things from the tree because he knows the tree will provide.  It starts by using the tree’s leaves and shade, harmless enough I’ll grant.  But then it evolves to taking the tree’s apples, to finally cutting the tree down for wood?  That has some seriously disturbing implications.  He also never provides anything in return, even saying something simple like “thank you.”  Not once.
Perhaps we can take positive message away from the tree itself?  The tree gives to the boy because she loves him.  Sure, that can’t hurt, can it?  She needs him and loves him, even though she can’t provide the things he wants, she can give from herself so that he’ll be happy.
Except it’s a terrible concept.  The “tree” (if we want to continue pretending the analogy isn’t supposed to extend to people) continues to give and give until there is NOTHING LEFT.  Clearly this is a role model we can provide for young children.
Let’s not even start on the enforced gender roles, where the boy is constantly taking and the ‘girl’ is perpetually giving.
So.  This is a children’s book, and I might show it to my kids, but only so I can teach them what NOT to do.

hmm
well i

STOP

ghostkid:

jumblejo:

mikedurstewitzsodmg:

jumblejo:

THANK YOU.

hate this book and everything it promotes about entitlement complexes and codependent relationships and abusive egotistical assholes and ugh.

It’s a children’s book

Which makes it even worse.

This book encourages selfish, entitled behavior where this boy continues to ask for and take everything from the tree for his own use/gain until nothing but a stump remains.  How is this a message we want to send to children?

Where is the positive concept?

Is it in the boy’s behavior?  He continually shows up and asks for the tree to give to him.  No basis or reasons why, he just asks for things from the tree because he knows the tree will provide.  It starts by using the tree’s leaves and shade, harmless enough I’ll grant.  But then it evolves to taking the tree’s apples, to finally cutting the tree down for wood?  That has some seriously disturbing implications.  He also never provides anything in return, even saying something simple like “thank you.”  Not once.

Perhaps we can take positive message away from the tree itself?  The tree gives to the boy because she loves him.  Sure, that can’t hurt, can it?  She needs him and loves him, even though she can’t provide the things he wants, she can give from herself so that he’ll be happy.

Except it’s a terrible concept.  The “tree” (if we want to continue pretending the analogy isn’t supposed to extend to people) continues to give and give until there is NOTHING LEFT.  Clearly this is a role model we can provide for young children.

Let’s not even start on the enforced gender roles, where the boy is constantly taking and the ‘girl’ is perpetually giving.

So.  This is a children’s book, and I might show it to my kids, but only so I can teach them what NOT to do.

hmm

well i

STOP

(Source: beadsandsmoke)

  1. stupidsimplepimple reblogged this from librarymouse
  2. openmindedgoon reblogged this from audawg
  3. theresnosuchthingasalostcause reblogged this from ccc0urtney
  4. savanduh reblogged this from brittjayy
  5. brittjayy reblogged this from wifeystatusfosho
  6. weareallalittlefuckedup reblogged this from ccc0urtney
  7. neon-angel-dust reblogged this from h0pelessslyconfused
  8. stopthatdoor reblogged this from carynisacreep
  9. c-bus reblogged this from wifeystatusfosho
  10. h0pelessslyconfused reblogged this from ccc0urtney
  11. wellisntlifejustgrand reblogged this from wifeystatusfosho
  12. wifeystatusfosho reblogged this from zachsaunders
  13. tastemyrainbowxo reblogged this from ccc0urtney
  14. take-metotheriot reblogged this from ccc0urtney
  15. zachsaunders reblogged this from carynisacreep
  16. carynisacreep reblogged this from scifi-wasabii
  17. ccc0urtney reblogged this from carynisacreep
  18. scifi-wasabii reblogged this from dontfixitifithasntbroken
  19. s-tung reblogged this from thisurlmakesnosense
  20. blackpo0l reblogged this from miscalculation
  21. k0schkaa reblogged this from luckyeahshelsilverstein
  22. stephaniekahlo reblogged this from dai-theflu
  23. dontfixitifithasntbroken reblogged this from lorizsister and added:
    Hahahahahahahaha.
  24. lorizsister reblogged this from luckyeahshelsilverstein
  25. jacquelyneee reblogged this from antiguy
  26. thelightsshinee reblogged this from ohmydiddydays
  27. ohmydiddydays reblogged this from luckyeahshelsilverstein
  28. meghanbee reblogged this from eebnahgem
  29. lanceinmypants reblogged this from wordbirrrd and added:
    How I would talk, if I was some kind of fruit-bearing tree.
  30. andrewwohl reblogged this from luckyeahshelsilverstein
  31. yo-wasup reblogged this from thisurlmakesnosense and added:
    loooooooooooooooool.
  32. thisurlmakesnosense reblogged this from illumi-naughty
  33. thelesbianthespian reblogged this from liz-thekid
  34. fluor-escent-adol-escent reblogged this from helloarcy
  35. eldesputa reblogged this from kat-mother
  36. mysenseofhumorisperfect reblogged this from lets-play-ball
  37. mpelite16 reblogged this from whataboringlifehatingeveryday
  38. whataboringlifehatingeveryday reblogged this from yourfellowhumandweller
  39. my-middle-finger-salutes-youu reblogged this from b-l-o-w-i-n-g-smoke
  40. b-l-o-w-i-n-g-smoke reblogged this from matt-frick